Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Giant Scale Aircraft - General
Reload this Page >

Today's Fllight pack options.

Notices
Giant Scale Aircraft - General Discuss all other giant scale aircraft here.

Today's Fllight pack options.

Old 01-21-2017, 07:26 PM
  #1  
Scota4570
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Today's Fllight pack options.

I took a few years away from RC. I want to take it up again. I fly giant scale, 1/4 scale, gas. I was running dual A123 2S packs. Dual RX switches with charging jacks. The ignition uses a BEC that i can switch from the TX.

My old A123s are at about 1/2 the rated capacity. A123s are now more expensive. At $13 a cell, that is $52 a plane, and with four planes, that is a lot.

For somewhat less money, and less messing around building packs I could just use these:

https://hobbyking.com/en_us/zippy-fl...epo4-pack.html

I do want to stay with LiFe batteries. I am not interested in LiPO or NIMH.

Any opinions on the zippys or something similar?
Old 01-21-2017, 08:11 PM
  #2  
All Day Dan
My Feedback: (5)
 
All Day Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MANHATTAN BEACH, CA
Posts: 4,606
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

These are the best. Dan.
http://www.hangtimes.com/a123_packs.html
Old 01-21-2017, 09:09 PM
  #3  
Scota4570
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess it has not changed.
Old 01-21-2017, 09:41 PM
  #4  
karolh
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mandeville, JAMAICA
Posts: 6,832
Received 33 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

IMHO A123's is the way to go. I get my A123's from Richard at Wrong Way R/C who is a great guy to do business with.
Old 01-22-2017, 02:09 AM
  #5  
Lifer
My Feedback: (1)
 
Lifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

I have been using the HK Life packs for many years now with zero failures. I'm not advocating them, just reporting the facts. I use them in 60cc warbirds all the way down to .15 glow powered sport planes. Zero failures.
Old 01-22-2017, 07:15 AM
  #6  
jwrich
My Feedback: (17)
 
jwrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Enid, OK
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I have switched all my planes to the A123 batteries, using the same set up you use. I buy my batteries from Value Hobby http://www.valuehobby.com. I have not had any failure and the price is right.

Rich
Old 01-22-2017, 09:12 AM
  #7  
Scota4570
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jwrich
I have switched all my planes to the A123 batteries, using the same set up you use. I buy my batteries from Value Hobby http://www.valuehobby.com. I have not had any failure and the price is right.

Rich
They only list 5C and 10C LiFE batteries. My understanding is that current is a big deal with the big servos. That I why I switched to the A123 2300mah batteries. They spec at 20C, 50 amps. That is far more than the wires or switches can handle. IF a 10C battery is enough I can cut the cost of packs in half.

I run four Hitech HS-755MG and HS-311 for the throttle. IF I don't need all those amps that changes things. Can I get by with less? What is the current draw on a set up like mine flown with moderate (pattern type) aerobatics?
Old 01-22-2017, 09:55 AM
  #8  
All Day Dan
My Feedback: (5)
 
All Day Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MANHATTAN BEACH, CA
Posts: 4,606
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Scota, Charge your batteries. Fly for ten minutes. Charge your batteries. Write down the mah returned to the battery. Do this six times. Add up the six numbers. The total is the number of mah you have consumed in one hour of flying. If you fly for one hour each time you go flying double this number for a safety factor for your battery capacity. That "C" number is the charge rate. It has nothing to do with the discharge capacity. It sounds like you are have one battery pack for you RC and ignition. This adds a significant load to the battery. Most guys use a separate battery pack for the ignition. It's a more reliable configuration.If the BEC fries you'll be out of luck. Dan.
Old 01-22-2017, 10:41 AM
  #9  
Lifer
My Feedback: (1)
 
Lifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

I understand that the "C" rating IS the max discharge rate for high energy situations.
Old 01-22-2017, 11:05 AM
  #10  
Scota4570
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The BEC allows me to switch the ignition from the TX. IMHO it is a very important safety factor.

"I understand that the "C" rating IS the max discharge rate for high energy situations."

That is my understanding too.

I have been checking my old AA NIMH 5-cell packs. They are nothing fancy, just tenergy cells. They are in better shape than my newer brand name A123 26650 cells. They are right at original capacity, 2000 mah. At 5 amp discharge they get warm but deliver the current. The pigtails get warm too.

IF the wires in the power system are the limiting factor on how much current can be delivered, why am I using batteries that can pump out 50 amps?

Last edited by Scota4570; 01-22-2017 at 11:10 AM.
Old 01-22-2017, 11:10 AM
  #11  
All Day Dan
My Feedback: (5)
 
All Day Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MANHATTAN BEACH, CA
Posts: 4,606
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Could be Lifer but it has no value for RC use. We have to be very careful with the discharge rate because those Life batteries collapse dramatically. Dan.


Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	LiFe.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	27.0 KB
ID:	2197676  
Old 01-22-2017, 11:30 AM
  #12  
Lifer
My Feedback: (1)
 
Lifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

I think we're dealing with convoluted terms. There is no way any current battery system would survive being charged at 50 times it rated capacity. A high discharge-rate battery simply means it is capable of releasing its energy at a fast rate, for a short period of time, and not getting damaged or overheating in the process. There is absolutely no risk in using a high "C" rated battery in the flight pack. You will never draw current anywhere near those capabilities. Higher "C" rated batteries are more expensive to produce, and that is why less exotic 5 or 10 "C" rated packs are typically recommended for radio system operation.

To the original poster: Research is always a good idea, but asking open-ended questions on these forums tend to bring out a lot of arm-chair quarterbacks that really need to separate opinion from knowledge.
Old 01-22-2017, 12:17 PM
  #13  
Scota4570
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lifer
I think we're dealing with convoluted terms. There is no way any current battery system would survive being charged at 50 times it rated capacity. A high discharge-rate battery simply means it is capable of releasing its energy at a fast rate, for a short period of time, and not getting damaged or overheating in the process. There is absolutely no risk in using a high "C" rated battery in the flight pack. You will never draw current anywhere near those capabilities. Higher "C" rated batteries are more expensive to produce, and that is why less exotic 5 or 10 "C" rated packs are typically recommended for radio system operation.

To the original poster: Research is always a good idea, but asking open-ended questions on these forums tend to bring out a lot of arm-chair quarterbacks that really need to separate opinion from knowledge.
Thanks

I've been checking my packs. I have eight packs. They are all junk. I bought the cells from the most prominent Chinese hobby dealer as cells. They look just like real A123 systems #26650, and were advertised as such, at about $14 a cell. I have very few cycles on the packs. I left them at full charge 3-years ago.

I suspect they are not the real deal. That is probably my answer to the "what happened to my batteries" Question. The genuine A123 Systems 26650 cells still seem to be still state of the art.

Thanks everybody. It was not my intention to start an argument.

Scot
Old 01-22-2017, 12:34 PM
  #14  
Lifer
My Feedback: (1)
 
Lifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

One last opinion based on hard-earned experience: Never be loyal to a battery pack. If it is old, questionable, etc., toss it out. Batteries are the least expensive component in your airplane. Replace whenever there is any doubt.

Enjoy your giant-scale planes! There are a lot of fun.
Old 01-22-2017, 02:22 PM
  #15  
Desertlakesflying
My Feedback: (28)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sun Valley, NV
Posts: 2,901
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

I've never had a problem with Hobby King batteries either from foamys to turbines.
Old 01-22-2017, 04:57 PM
  #16  
karolh
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mandeville, JAMAICA
Posts: 6,832
Received 33 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Lifer;12298587]One last opinion based on hard-earned experience: Never be loyal to a battery pack. If it is old, questionable, etc., toss it out. Batteries are the least expensive component in your airplane. Replace whenever there is any doubt.

How old is too old for A123 batteries ?? So far I have some that are approaching 8 years old that still perform just as well as they did when I bought them.
Old 01-23-2017, 04:39 PM
  #17  
All Day Dan
My Feedback: (5)
 
All Day Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MANHATTAN BEACH, CA
Posts: 4,606
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Oops, I got my "C"s mixed up. Thanks for everyone who caught that. The moral of this story is that only flight testing can determine the capacity of the pack needed for the individual's model and flying habits. Dan.
Old 01-24-2017, 08:24 AM
  #18  
Scota4570
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I checked my packs by cycling them and noting MAH for a discharge and for a charge. All of the packs were way below specs. They did not hold what they were supposed to. Trying drain them at any substancial rate pulled them below 2V/cell. They were marked 2011 manufacture date. They were the Olevin Hobby King version. Since mine were gently used an stored in favorable condtions, it might be worth analyzing any packs or cells you all have out here before you fly them.

I ordered a bunch of brand new A123 cells. There is only one authorized dealer in the USA for GENUINE cells. They also drop the price in half if you order several cells. I'll make up news packs.

I use the 3rd wire on a Futaba type plug for a tap between the cells. That makes it possible to balance the packs in the airplane using the charge port. So, I need to make my own packs. Pretty good deal for $20 a pack.
Old 01-24-2017, 09:20 AM
  #19  
All Day Dan
My Feedback: (5)
 
All Day Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MANHATTAN BEACH, CA
Posts: 4,606
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Scota, Try doing the same tests with the fresh set of batteries. Use a cutoff voltage of 3.2 volts per cell. I tried it and was very surprised, unpleasantly, with what I got. Dan.
Old 01-24-2017, 10:35 AM
  #20  
Scota4570
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Please share Dan.

If the A123 cells don't live up to promises I want to know. I switched from Sub-C Nimh to them because of the promises. They cost more after all. I did nottice that my voltage monitor on the airplane showed less lights when I operated the control surfaces with the A123s than the Sub-Cs. That indicated the voltage sags and the cells are not giving as much current. IF that is so the 50+ amp promises are BS. I attributed it to something I was not understanding.
Old 01-24-2017, 11:53 AM
  #21  
BarracudaHockey
My Feedback: (11)
 
BarracudaHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 26,958
Received 343 Likes on 274 Posts
Default

Interesting, I've been flying real A123 cells from Wrongway RC and Tail Dragger RC for years. Hundreds of flights, many times what any average modeler would get per year.

I also run my ignition from the flight pack on anything up to and including 60cc with no ill effects using a single 2500mah A123 and a Tech Aero IBEC.

Anything larger gets a power safe rx and a tech aero IBEC

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.